Military Crimes Of The United States Constitution - 998 Words

The arrest and trial of enemy combatants by military tribunal poses no significant moral issues. It is military order to detain those accused of international terrorism. Every country has their own guidelines and regulations when it comes to punishments, the U.S. punishments could be worse. Overall, the American government has and will try to do all that is necessary in order to protect all Americans. As of 2001, a new order in war was presented. The United States Constitution allows Congress the enumerated war power to form rules regarding captures on land as well as water (Art. I, Section 8). Congress delegates the president with the authority to remove any enemy combatants considered harmful. The president’s power to have such authorization of the detainment, sequestering of one as â€Å"enemy combatants† without a criminal indictment comes from the law of war and is supported by the Supreme Court authority. George W. Bush, president and Commander in Chief of the Arm ed Forces, declared that it is of military order to detain those accused of terrorism in U.S. military custody. According to the Constitutional Rights Foundation, also â€Å"[those who knowingly harbor such individuals]†¦those who have engaged in, aided, or conspired to commit international terrorist acts against the United States or its citizens† (Military Tribunals). How can the arrest and trial of enemy combatants by military tribunal pose significant moral issues if it is part of military order? It is going to beShow MoreRelatedConstitutional Law1072 Words   |  5 PagesReasoning(O’Connor, J.) Yes. A U.S. citizen accused of being an enemy combatant must be afforded an opportunity to be heard by a neutral decision maker. The Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution guarantees the right to due process under the law. Furthermore, absent suspension, all persons detained in the United States have the right to habeas corpus. This means that an individual accused of criminal activity cannot be detained indefinitely, with no trial, no counsel, and no ability to petition forRead MoreThe Constitutional Convention Of The Constitution1179 Words   |  5 PagesMost of the framers of the constitution either attended or graduated college, were involved in the American Revolution, and had already been involved in the government. The Constitutional Convention was a meeting held in Philadelphia between May and September of 1787. There, delegates discussed revisions to the United States Government. The Constitutional Convention was held in order to address the problems of the weak central g overnment that existed under the Articles of Confederation. Many of theRead More Tribunals Essays1344 Words   |  6 Pages President Bushs decision to consider establishing military tribunals to prosecute accused terrorists has set off a major debate on civil liberties in the United States. Supporters argue that such a measure is a constitutional necessity to address terrorism of an unprecedented scope. Opponents claim that the tribunals would undermine the rule of law and deprive defendants of the protection provided for in the American system of justice. My research and personnel experience on the subject has foundRead MoreCivil Liberties During World War II1665 Words   |  7 Pagesacceptable as proven through the analysis of the different stances by examining related cases, text, and the constitution. There are five main positions on how the courts should view civil liberties during war time: success, no exception, maybe, dilemma, and living constitution. â€Å"Success† is the â€Å"whatever it takes to win† approach, meaning that rights given to the individual by the US constitution can be revoked during wartime. â€Å"No exception† is the opposite to the success approach, meaning that no matterRead MoreEssay Korematsu v. United States827 Words   |  4 PagesKorematsu v. United States Korematsu v. United States (1944) actually began December 7, 1941 with the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. The attack on Pearl Harbor then began the conquering of Wake, Guam, Philippines, Malaya, Singapore, Dutch East Indies, New Guinea, Solomon Islands, and Burma. With the attack on Pearl Harbor, racism, which was hardly unfamiliar, became an even greater problem. The Japanese Governments attacks on Americans including; torturing, raping, and murdering wasRead MoreBranches Of Government : The United States1578 Words   |  7 PagesThough the United States follows a republic approach to writing legislation and passing law, technology presents a challenge. In an environment that changes daily, technological legislation will no sooner be passed, and it is already obsolete. The rate of technological advancement and espionage present a real threat, not only to the United States, but to the world. How can law be generalized so as to affect a process relative to technology and softwa re design that prevents transnational crime? A CollaborationRead MoreGun Control Regulations Do Not Deter Violence And Crime1356 Words   |  6 Pagesabsence of mass shootings or gun violence and crime, it has definately been shown to significantly reduce these rates. America is in need of tighter gun control laws because current regulations do not deter violence and crime, and the interpretation of the constitutional right has since been misconstrued. Current Gun Control regulations do not deter violence and crime. It has been shown that places that have relaxed their gun control laws have a higher crime and death rate. Data proves that homicideRead More†Ã¢â‚¬â„¢We should not blame a gun itself for any crime or any acts of violence, any more than we can800 Words   |  4 Pages†Ã¢â‚¬â„¢We should not blame a gun itself for any crime or any acts of violence, any more than we can blame a pen for misspelling a word’† (Rodkey). This statement, made by Robert Bennett, makes a very valid about why citizens should be allowed to own firearms freely. It is a privilege clearly given to Americans in the United States Constitution. One mistake made by someone does not mean that guns should be taken away from other innocent people. Be able to own a firearm is a right given to us in theRead MoreHow Should We Treat Non American Prisoners1274 Words   |  6 Pagesunderstand that these are suspected terrorists and war criminals and I agree they forfeit certain rights because of that, that doesn’t mean they are left to rot in prison for the rest of their lives with no access to the legal process. Under the Constitution the federal government can unquestionably suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus if the public safety requires it during times of rebellion or invasion. The issue is whether Congress or the president holds this power. Historical perspectiveRead MoreThe Policing Model : Brazil1160 Words   |  5 Pagespolice, the state military police and fire brigade, and the state civil police. Brazil police officers only have two main functions which is to keep order and to make sure laws are not broken. The Federal Police: The federal police main function is to investigate crimes that are against the federal government, to fight international drug trafficking, and terrorism, and are the immigration and border police as well. The Federal Highway Police: These officers main job is to combat crimes on Brazilian